For enquiries call:

Phone

+1-469-442-0620

Easter Sale-mobile

HomeBlogDatabaseSerializability in DBMS: Types, Examples, Advantages

Serializability in DBMS: Types, Examples, Advantages

Published
03rd Jan, 2024
Views
view count loader
Read it in
12 Mins
In this article
    Serializability in DBMS: Types, Examples, Advantages

    Databases form the backbone of most modern applications. A properly designed database can provide your application with a high-performance, reliable storage solution. This blog aims to introduce you to the concept of serializability and explain how it affects database design. We'll also provide an example to help illustrate how serializability works. Finally, we will conclude with a few examples of the importance of serializability in database systems. Stay tuned!

    What is Serializability in DBMS?

    In computer science, serializability is a property of a system describing how different processes operate on shared data. A system is serializable if its result is the same as if the operations were executed in some sequential order, meaning there is no overlap in execution. A database management system (DBMS) can be accomplished by locking data so that no other process can access it while it is being read or written.

    With MongoDB Developer certification, database systems use various locking levels to allow concurrent processing while maintaining data integrity. The most restrictive level, serializable, employs strict two-phase locking (2PL). In the first phase, locks are acquired on all data objects before any operation can be executed. Locks are then released only after the transaction has been completed. This guarantees that there are no conflicting operations, and that each transaction sees a consistent view of the database.

    While 2PL provides strong guarantees, it can lead to decreased performance due to lock contention and the increased overhead of acquiring and releasing locks. As a result, systems often relax the serializability constraint to allow for better performance. The most common approach is to allow operations that do not conflict with each other to execute concurrently. This still ensures that the final result is equivalent to some sequential execution but allows for improved performance by allowing operations to be interleaved.

    All in all, serializability is a property of a system that describes how different processes operate on shared data. In a database management system, this can be accomplished by locking data so that no other process can access it while it is being read or written. Serializability guarantees that the final result is equivalent to some sequential execution but allows for improved performance by allowing operations that do not conflict with each other to execute concurrently.

    What is a Serializable Schedule?

    In a database management system (DBMS), a serializable schedule is a sequence of database actions (read and write operations) that does not violate the serializability property. This property ensures that each transaction appears to execute atomically and is isolated from other transactions' effects. In order for serializability of schedules in DBMS, it must be equivalent to some serial schedule of the same transactions. In other words, the schedule must produce the same results as if the transactions were executed one at a time in some order.

    There are several different algorithms that can be used to check for a serializable schedule in DBMS. One such algorithm is the conflict serializability algorithm, which checks for potential conflicts between transactions. A conflict occurs when two transactions try to access the same data item in conflicting ways (e.g., one transaction tries to read a data item while another transaction is writing to it). If there are no conflicts, then the schedule is guaranteed to be serializable. However, if there are conflicts, then the schedule may or may not be serializable.

    Another algorithm that can be used to check for serializability is the view serializability in the DBMS algorithm, which checks for potential mutual dependencies between transactions. A mutual dependency exists when two transactions depend on each other for their respective outputs to be correct. If there are no mutual dependencies, then the schedule is guaranteed to be serializable. However, if there are mutual dependencies, then the schedule may or may not be serializable.

    Serializability can also be checked using the precedence graph algorithm, which checks for potential cycles between transactions' precedence relationships. A precedence relationship exists when one transaction must precede another transaction for the schedule to be valid. If there are no cycles, then the serializability of schedules in DBMS is guaranteed. However, if there are cycles, the schedule may or may not be serializable. To understand different algorithms comprehensively, take the MongoDB Administration certification and get expert analysis on the concept of serializability in DBMS.

    Types of Serializability

    In a database management system (DBMS), serializability requires that transactions appear to happen in a particular order, even if they execute concurrently. Transactions that are not serializable may produce incorrect results. There are different types of serializability in DBMS with different advantages and disadvantages. Here, we'll look closely at two of the most common types: conflict serializability and view serializability in DBMS.

    types of serializability

    1. Conflict Serializability

    Conflict serializability is a type of serializability in which conflicting operations on the same data items are executed in an order that preserves database consistency. Each transaction is assigned a unique number, and the operations within each transaction are executed in order based on that number. This ensures that no two conflicting operations are executed concurrently. For example, consider a database with two tables: Customers and Orders. A customer can have multiple orders, but each order can only be associated with one customer.

    Key conditions for conflict serializability.

    • Both operations belong to different transactions
    • Both operations are on the same data item
    • At least one of the two operations is a write operation

    If two transactions were to execute concurrently, one adding an order for customer A and the other adding an order for customer B, conflict serializability would ensure that the transaction adding the order for customer A would finish before the transaction adding the order for customer B. This would prevent any inconsistency in the database, such as an order being associated with the wrong customer.

    2. View Serializability

    View serializability is a type of serializability in which each transaction produces results that are equivalent to some well-defined sequential execution of all transactions in the system. Unlike conflict serializability, which focuses on preventing inconsistencies within the database, view serializability in DBMS focuses on providing users with consistent views of the database.

    In order to better understand view serialization in a database management system, it is important to consider schedules S1 and S2. These schedules are created with two transactions in mind, T1 and T2. In order for these schedules to be viewed as equivalent, the following three conditions must be met.

    The first condition is that both schedules must have the same set of committed transactions. This simply means that both schedules S1 and S2, cannot have different committed transactions. If one schedule has a committed transaction that the other does not, then the schedules are not viewed as equivalent.

    The second condition is that both schedules cannot have different numbers of read/write operations on the same data item. In other words, if schedule S1 has two write operations on data item A while schedule S2 only has one write operation on data item A, the schedules are not viewed as equivalent. The number of read operations can differ between the schedules as long as the number of write operations is equal.

    The last and final condition is that both schedules cannot have conflicting orders of execution for the same data items. For example, suppose in schedule S1 transaction T1 writes to data item A before transaction T2 does while in schedule S2 transaction T2 writes to data item A before transaction T1 does. In that case, the schedules are not viewed as equivalent. This conflicts with condition 2, which states that both schedules must have the same number of write operations on each data item. However, if all three conditions are met, the schedules can be considered equivalent.

    Testing of Serializability in DBMS with Examples

    Serializability is the property of a schedule whereby each transaction appears to execute atomically and independently, even though they actually execute concurrently. In other words, when several transactions are executed concurrently, they should appear as if they were executed either sequentially or not.

    Let's consider an example to understand better how serializability works in a database management system (DBMS). Suppose two users, Alice and Bob, are each executing two transactions: T1 and T2 for Alice and T3 and T4 for Bob. Further, suppose that T1 reads and writes data item X, T2 reads data item Y. T3 reads and writes data item Z, and T4 reads data item W.  

    Now let's say that the schedule of these transactions is as follows: 

    • `T1: Read X → Write X→  Read Y → Write Y` 
    • `T2: Read Y  → Write Y` 
    • `T3: Read Z  → Write Z→  Read W → Write W` 
    • `T4: Read W  → Write W` 

    First, let's see why this schedule is not serial.

    In order for a schedule to be considered serializable, it must first satisfy the conflict serializability property. In our example schedule above, notice that Transaction 1 (T1) and Transaction 2 (T2) read data item Y before either writing it. This causes a conflict between T1 and T2 because they are both trying to read and write the same data item concurrently. Therefore, the given schedule does not conflict with serializability. 

    However, there is another type of serializability called view serializability which our example does satisfy. View serializability requires that if two transactions cannot see each other's updates (i.e., one transaction cannot see the effects of another concurrent transaction), the schedule is considered to view serializable. In our example, Transaction 2 (T2) cannot see any updates made by Transaction 4 (T4) because they do not share common data items. Therefore, the schedule is viewed as serializable.

    It's important to note that conflict serializability is a stronger property than view serializability because it requires that all potential conflicts be resolved before any updates are made (i.e., each transaction must either read or write each data item before any other transaction can write it). View serializability only requires that if two transactions cannot see each other's updates, then the schedule is view serializable & it doesn't matter whether or not there are potential conflicts between them.

    All in all, both properties are necessary for ensuring correctness in concurrent transactions in a database management system.

    Benefits of Serializability in DBMS

    Now that we understand the serializability in DBMS let's look at some benefits of Serializability in DBMS.  

    1. Predictable Executions: Since all threads are executed one at a time, there are no surprises. All variables are updated as expected, and no data is lost or corrupted.  
    2. Easier to Reason about & Debug: As each thread is executed alone, it is easier to reason about what each thread is doing and why. This can make debugging much easier since you don't have to worry about concurrency issues.  
    3. Reduced Costs: Serialization in DBMS can help reduce hardware costs by allowing fewer resources to be used for a given computation (e.g., only one CPU instead of two). Additionally, it can help reduce software development costs by making it easier to reason about code and reducing the need for extensive testing with multiple threads running concurrently.  
    4. Increased Performance: In some cases, serializable executions can perform better than their non-serializable counterparts since they allow the developer to optimize their code for performance.  

    These are some benefits of serializability in DBMS, but how can you get maximum benefits? To get a thorough perspective, opt for the Knowledgehut MongoDB Developer certification course to know the ins and outs of DBMS and your future with the management systems.

    Conclusion

    DBMS transactions must follow the ACID properties to be considered serializable. There are different types of serializability in DBMS, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. In most cases, selecting the right type of serializability will come down to a trade-off between performance and correctness. Selecting the wrong type of serializability can lead to errors in your database that can be difficult to debug and fix. Hopefully, this guide has given you a better understanding of how Serializability in DBMS works and what kinds of serializability exist.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

    1How is the precedence graph made to check serializability in DBMS?

    A precedence graph in DBMS is a graphical representation of a schedule in which a node represents each transaction, and the edges represent the order in which the transactions are executed. To check if a schedule is serializable, we can construct its precedence graph in DBMS and check for any cycles. If there are no cycles, then the schedule is serializable. Otherwise, it is not.

    2What is the difference between conflict and view serializability in DBMS?

    Conflict serializability is a relaxed form that allows for certain types of conflicts between operations as long as the overall order of those operations is maintained. View serializability is a more stringent form of serializability that requires that all operations be conflict-free. In other words, view serializability places stricter requirements on the order of operations than conflict serializability. 

    3What is the significance of serialization in DBMS?

    Serialization converts an object into a format that can be stored in a database. This is important because it allows for the data to be stored in a way that is efficient and easy to retrieve. It also ensures that the data is consistent and accurate, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the database.

    Profile

    Spandita Hati

    Blog Author

    Spandita is a dynamic content writer who holds a master's degree in Forensics but loves to play with words and dabble in digital marketing. Being an avid travel blogger, she values engaging content that attracts, educates and inspires. With extensive experience in SEO tools and technologies, her writing interests are as varied as the articles themselves. In her leisure, she consumes web content and books in equal measure.

    Share This Article
    Ready to Master the Skills that Drive Your Career?

    Avail your free 1:1 mentorship session.

    Select
    Your Message (Optional)

    Upcoming Database Batches & Dates

    NameDateFeeKnow more
    Whatsapp/Chat icon