Search

Scrum.org Presents Scrum With Kanban To Improve Transparency

Scrum.org, with the motto of improving the profession of software delivery, announced its new ‘Scrum with Kanban’ course to build a bridge between Scrum and Kanban. This positive step by Scrum.org is intended to teach the individuals and teams how to harness Scrum with Kanban practices, without changing Scrum framework.  To come up with the course, Scrum.org and its Professional Scrum Trainers (PSTs) worked with Daniel Vacanti, who built up the Kanban method for learning purpose in 2007 and has been organizing Kanban training, mentoring, and counseling from that point forward, to make the course. Basically, Scrum teams implement Scrum to address complex problems and deliver a high-quality product to the customers. As Scrum teams develop, they learn by ‘Inspect and Adapt method’, a key pillar of Agile and Scrum for further improvement. This leads to integrating other practices like Kanban, Continuous Delivery, Story mapping and so on. The Scrum with Kanban course is particularly custom-made for Scrum Teams who need to utilize Kanban to get enhanced transparency, flow, and perceptibility of their work, without affecting Scrum. Many Scrum teams started using Kanban practices for quickly delivering more value to their customers. But at the same time, there is a confusion on how to work well together. This course demonstrates the practical ways of improving Scrum teams with Kanban practices. One more thing to keep in mind while combining Scrum and Kanban is to ensure that the individuals and teams are implementing Kanban very well.   A great team always sees the scope of improvement, and Scrum with Kanban course provides the ways to maximize the organizational benefits. Source: Scrum.org
Rated 4.0/5 based on 1 customer reviews

Scrum.org Presents Scrum With Kanban To Improve Transparency

183
Scrum.org Presents Scrum With Kanban To Improve Transparency

Scrum.org, with the motto of improving the profession of software delivery, announced its new ‘Scrum with Kanban’ course to build a bridge between Scrum and Kanban. This positive step by Scrum.org is intended to teach the individuals and teams how to harness Scrum with Kanban practices, without changing Scrum framework. 

To come up with the course, Scrum.org and its Professional Scrum Trainers (PSTs) worked with Daniel Vacanti, who built up the Kanban method for learning purpose in 2007 and has been organizing Kanban training, mentoring, and counseling from that point forward, to make the course.

Scrum.org quotes

Basically, Scrum teams implement Scrum to address complex problems and deliver a high-quality product to the customers. As Scrum teams develop, they learn by ‘Inspect and Adapt method’, a key pillar of Agile and Scrum for further improvement. This leads to integrating other practices like Kanban, Continuous Delivery, Story mapping and so on. The Scrum with Kanban course is particularly custom-made for Scrum Teams who need to utilize Kanban to get enhanced transparency, flow, and perceptibility of their work, without affecting Scrum.

Many Scrum teams started using Kanban practices for quickly delivering more value to their customers. But at the same time, there is a confusion on how to work well together. This course demonstrates the practical ways of improving Scrum teams with Kanban practices. One more thing to keep in mind while combining Scrum and Kanban is to ensure that the individuals and teams are implementing Kanban very well.  

A great team always sees the scope of improvement, and Scrum with Kanban course provides the ways to maximize the organizational benefits.

Source: Scrum.org

KnowledgeHut

KnowledgeHut Editor

Author

KnowledgeHut is a fast growing Management Consulting and Training firm that is a source of Intelligent Information support for businesses and professionals across the globe.


Website : http://www.knowledgehut.com/

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

1 comments

Anil 09 May 2018

Thanks sharing the article. It really helps us in understanding the scrum !

Suggested Blogs

Scrum Master and Product Owner: Understanding the differences

 Agile methodology imparts the easy and convenient path to work. Scrum is one of the famous Agile methodologies. Agile methodologies consists of 4 main roles, viz. Product Owner, Scrum Master, Scrum team and Stakeholder. Each role has its share of responsibilities. These roles are all about commitment. Scrum master and the Product owner are two vital roles in the Scrum Software Development Methodology. Since they both are working on different areas of the project, they are indispensable for the project. Scrum Master is a mediator between the Product owner and the Development Team.       Product Owner vs Scrum Master- Though the Product Owner and the Scrum master vary in their roles, they complement each other. Scrum master should support the product Owner in every step possible. There should be an amicable relationship between the Product owner and the Scrum master. Disputes may happen between them if the roles are not clarified. Let us have a look at the differences in roles between the product owner and the scrum master. The Scrum Master concentrates on the project success, by assisting the product owner and the team in using the right process for creating a successful target and establishing the Agile principles.    Scrum Master Skills (SM): SM creates a friendly environment for the team for Agile development. SM improves the quality of the product. Certified Scrum Master Certification, adds advantage to become effective. SM protects his team from any kind of distraction and allows them to stay tuned. SM helps product owner to maximize ROI (return on investment) to meet the objectives. SM removes disputes between the product owner and the development team. SM encourages the team to meet the project deadline. SM acts like a coach for a team to perform better. A good Scrum Master should possess the skills like project management, engineering, designing, testing background and disciplines. SM provides continuous guidance to teams   Duties of Scrum Master: SM facilitates team for better vision and always tries to improve the efficiency of the teams. SM manages Scrum processes in Agile methodology. SM removes impediments for the Scrum team. SM arranges daily quick stand-up meetings to ensure proper use of processes. SM helps product owner to prepare good product backlog and sets it for the next sprint. Conducting retrospective meetings. SM organizes and facilitates the sprint planning meeting. The Product Owner’s responsibility is to focus on the product success, to build a product which works better for the users and the customers and to create a product which meets business requirements. The product owner can interact with the users and customers, stakeholders, the development team and the scrum master.   Product Owner Skills (PO): PO should have an idea about the business value of the product and the customers’ demands. Certified Scrum Product Owner Certification (CSPO) will be beneficial for the sales team. The development team consults PO, so he should always be available for them to implement the features correctly. PO should understand the program from the end-user point of view. Marketing is discussed on the sales level in most of the Organizations. So it is the PO’s duty to guide the marketing persons to achieve the goals successfully. PO is responsible for the product and the ways to flourish a business. PO has to focus for the proper production and ROI as well. PO should be able to solve the problems, completing trade-off analysis and making decisions about business deliverables. After CSPO course, PO can work with the project managers and the technical leads to prioritize the scope for product development. Sometimes PO and the Customers are same, sometimes Customers are thousands or millions of people.   Duties of the Product Owner: PO has to attend the daily sprint planning meetings. PO prioritizes the product features, so the development team can clearly understand them. PO decides the deadlines for the project. PO determines the release date and contents. PO manages and creates the product backlog for implementation, which is nothing but the prioritized backlog of user stories. PO defines user stories to the development team. Spending some time to prioritize the user stories with few team members. One can enhance his/her knowledge in many directions and beyond boundaries, after undergoing the Certified Scrum Product Owner (CSPO) training.
Rated 4.0/5 based on 1 customer reviews
3681
Scrum Master and Product Owner: Understanding the ...

 Agile methodology imparts the easy and convenien... Read More

How To Pass Leading SAFe® 4 Exam ?

Scaled Agile Framework is a roadmap that leads the organizations in implementing the Lean and Agile Practices. SAFe® includes the three foundational bodies of knowledge that are System Thinking, Lean Product Development, and Agile Software Development. It helps the organizations to improve themselves according to the business requirements, deals with challenges involved in developing and delivering ideal software and systems within a specified time. SAFe® practices are essential but, sometimes they can be complex and entail some challenges. It might be easy to deal with such challenges and move your enterprise towards SAFe® practices by becoming a professional SAFe® Agilist. Passing a SAFe® Agilist Certification exam proves that you are an expert in implementing Agile and improving the project you want to get involved in.Here, in this article, we will guide you through your Leading SAFe® 4 exam preparation.Firstly, the 2-day Leading SAFe® 4.6 training is the most crucial part of this certification. Join the course and ask all the doubts you have during the workshop without any hesitation. Make a note of all the important things which will be helpful for future references. After completing the course successfully, you should pass the exam to obtain SAFe® Agilist Certification.Exam DetailsFormat of the examThis is a web-based, timed, and closed book exam that will be conducted in English and delivered in the format of multiple choice questions. Upon completion of the Leading SAFe® training, candidates will get access to the exam within the SAFe® Community Platform. Candidates will have 90 minutes to finish the exam once it starts.The exam consists of 45 questions in total and you must answer a minimum of 34 questions correct out of 45. You can take the exam at any time and the fee for the first attempt will be included in the course registration fee only if the exam is taken within 30 days of course completion.Retake policy of the examIf the certification exam is not cleared in the first attempt, you can retake the exam again and again, but each retake costs $50.You can take the second attempt immediately after the first attemptYou need to wait for a minimum of 10 days to retake the exam for the third timeA minimum of 30-day wait is required to retake the exam fourth timeCandidates are not allowed to retake the exam, once they got a minimum passing score of 76% unless there are updates announced to the exam.Exam preparationThe exam is specifically designed to analyze the skills and knowledge of a particular candidate. Develop a study plan before going to take the exam.Here are a few important points you should remember-You should gain both practical and theoretical knowledge in order to pass the exam successfully.The course materials are more helpful to prepare for the exam and we at KnowledgeHut offer course materials authored by the Scaled Agile Academy. These materials can be used for referring the concepts that are presented during the training.Take the practice tests that are designed with the same level of difficulty, time duration, and the same number of questions. You can take the exam without any additional cost. The practice tests once completed, let’s you know the chapters you should study more in pink color. Study those topics again.  As a preparation, on scaledagileframework.com, on the big picture (framework) click on the words if have confusion/not sure and read the guidance article. It makes you prepare well for the main certification exam and boosts your confidence level.Choosing a right path takes you to important destinations in your career. Becoming a SAFe® 4 Agilist is a career path for many and it requires an excellent range of skills. The best institute guides you towards a bright career. So, choose the right and best institute that is authorized to do so and can help you reach your goals.
Rated 4.0/5 based on 15 customer reviews
3843
How To Pass Leading SAFe® 4 Exam ?

Scaled Agile Framework is a roadmap that leads the... Read More

Agile Project Management Vs. Traditional Project Management

In this fast-moving world, project management has become one of the most important pillars that are helping businesses run without any glitch in their processes. Both small and large scale organizations around the world are exploiting technology and depending on project management systems to deliver the software development project successfully. Whether it is team workflow management or timing, these tools help to ensure that everything is going well without any obstacles. While there are tens of different project management approaches, Agile is considered one of the most practical and flexible software development mechanism that exist today. It is capable of executing a variety of tasks, but what sets it apart from others? Let’s find it out. Here’s a brief comparison of Agile management and traditional project management software:                                                                                                                    Traditional vs Agile Project Management Overview of Agile and Traditional Project Management What is Traditional Project Management? The traditional Project Management (waterfall) approach is linear where all the phases of a process occur in sequence. Its concept depends on predictable tools and predictable experience. Each and every project follows the same life cycle which includes the stages such as feasibility, plan, design, build, test, production, support, as shown in the figure above. The entire project is planned upfront without any scope for changing requirements. This approach assumes that time and cost are variables and requirements are fixed. This is the reason why traditional project management faces budget and timeline issues. What is Agile Project Management? When a traditional system focuses on upfront planning where factors like cost, scope, and time are given importance, Agile management gives prominence to teamwork, customer collaboration, and flexibility. It is an iterative approach that focuses more on incorporating customer feedback and continuous releases with every iteration of software development project. The basic concept behind Agile software development is that it delves into evolving changes and collaborative effort to bring out results rather than a predefined process. Adaptive planning is perhaps the biggest feature of Agile and one that makes it a crowd favorite among project managers. Scrum and Kanban are two of the most widely used Agile frameworks. They are very well known for encouraging decision-making and preventing time consumption on variables that are bound to change. It stresses customer satisfaction and uses available teams to fast-track software development at every stage. The table below shows the major differences between Agile project management and traditional project management.                                                                                Table: Agile project management vs traditional project management Why is Agile Preferred and why not the traditional project management? Agile is preferred by most developers and managers because of a variety of reasons. Let’s have a look at the most common ones: Project complexity Traditional: This method is the best fit for small or less complex projects as it follows linear approach. Sudden changes in the project or any other complexities can block the entire process and make the team go back to step one and start all over again. Agile: This is the best methodology to follow in case of complex projects. A complex project may have various interconnected phases and each stage may be dependent on many others rather than a single one as in simple projects. So, Agile methods are preferred for large complex projects, as they can respond better to such structures. Adaptability Traditional: This approach works with a belief that once a phase is done, it will not be reviewed again. So, it is not adaptable to rapid changes in the work plan. In case if any sudden situation arises or any change in the requirements from the client’s side, traditional approach fails to adapt to the new change. The only choice is to start from the very beginning once again. This wastes a lot of effort and time in the process. Agile: The adaptability factor is very high in this methodology since it is not linear. Complex projects consist of several interconnected stages, where a change in one stage can cause an effect on another. And the project managers can take calculated risks in such scenario, as there is a chance of high adaptability.  Scope for feedback and changes Traditional Each and every process is clearly detailed and defined at the start of the project in the traditional approach. It cannot deal with any big change or feedback that might require a change in the process. Mostly, the project delivery time and budget are fixed, allows change very rarely. Agile There is a high acceptance for feedback and change in this method. The process is very flexible and allows constant feedback that can help to provide better output within the fixed project delivery time. The main reason that managers or developers choose agile direction is for the flexibility it offers. Developers working with Agile management are able to respond to customer requests quickly as they are only addressing small parts of the project at a time and the customer validates each iteration or sprint before finalizing. Some of the important characteristics of Agile development Breaks project into parts Agile divides a project into parts (called iterations) where the release is sent to the customer after every single iteration. Additionally, the success of the project can be easily foreseen through the success of these iterations. This removes the need for upfront planning completely. Self-organized As mentioned above, Agile uses a parallel mode of management. Employees of a company are not managed by a central line of control, but by groups. For example, in Agile, there may be eight teams working on a single project. Each team is managed by itself without external guidance. The teams only interact with each other for project discussion and process linking as they are otherwise not self-sufficient. Generally speaking, an Agile project consists of three parts: The product owner – the expert on the project (for which the product is being developed) and is the main person who oversees the projects The scrum master – this person manages the process involved in Agile. He/she looks after the iterations and its completion The team – individuals who play significant and minor roles in the software development process Customer Engagement In Agile, customer engagement is at the very top. The customer is regarded highly in its frameworks as after every iteration, feedback is generated and acted upon. Overall, Agile is clearly the winner among project management systems. When compared with other traditional approaches, Agile’s features come to the fore and reiterate why it is one of the top software used by companies globally. Can Agile Coexist with Other Approaches? This is a question asked by many project managers, and opinions of experts seem to be divided. While some say it is possible for Agile to coexist with traditional project management systems, they suggest being cautious and using them for different terms. For example, using two different approaches on the same project can be counter-productive and highly explosive. As Agile and most other frameworks are totally contrasting to each other, the projects may go for a toss. On the other hand, some experts believe that it is not possible for Agile and other tools to co-exist because of their contrast. Using them together can cause disorder in the entire company system, making the productivity to go for a toss. Agile vs Traditional- Adoption Growth According to a recent online survey of 601 IT and development professionals, it is proved that Agile is the new typical formula for project success. The majority of projects and development teams are now adopting this methodology, while the traditional waterfall approaches have many flaws.    Traditional organizations vs. #Agile organizations #SALC16 pic.twitter.com/bBgxkQB1fI — Scrum Alliance (@ScrumAlliance) January 20, 2016 Agile was first introduced about 15 years ago as a substitute for traditional software development approaches. Many people considered it as challenging to implement traditional approach practices and Agile adopters stated that this new style of software development improves team collaboration and is more customer-centric.  Though Agile method was present more than a decade ago, the vast majority of organizations have adopted the practice in the last 5 years. Moreover, the survey reported that agile adoption saw an inflection point between the year 2009-2010. As shown in the above figure, agile adoption seems to have slow incremental growth till 2008 and then its growth was accelerated after gaining traction in the market. Reasons for the transition to Agile Most of the organizations who transitioned from traditional to agile project management have listed the following reasons: Improves collaboration between teams- 54% Enhances the quality level of software in organizations- 52% Results in enhanced customer satisfaction- 49% Speeds time to market- 43% Reduces development cost- 42% The Verdict In the traditional software development, the customer involves only before the start of the development process. So, there might be a number of mistakes and a large amount of money needs to be spent to rework on them. Since in the Agile software development, the customer involves at each stage, the corrections can be made once the defects are detected. This helps us in saving cost. As we can see, Agile project management is really in-demand for teams. It helps the team to work on the top priority ones at the right time and allows them to walk through the risks much faster than they would with traditional project management tools.  
Rated 4.0/5 based on 2 customer reviews
5986
Agile Project Management Vs. Traditional Project M...

In this fast-moving world, project management has ... Read More

other Blogs