Search

ITIL Pathway For The Best IT Solutions

A service provider should be customer-centric.Why do we have most customers moving from one service provider to another or in-sourcing as the trend is suggesting?  Is this because there is technology disruption happening which is new to even the service providers hence business wants to do it themselves                                                                                                           or  keep moving from one to another service provider                                                                                                            or  Is it that customer is not getting the solution that adds value to his business? Expectations of customers from IT service provider in the last few years have changed and rightly so. In the very beginning, it was all about IT cost benefit which was achieved, the next phase was about process-driven approach which was again achieved (ITIL played a very important role in achieving it). Now the expectation from the customer is about the value IT adds to the business, this is where ITIL should evolve from the way it is taught and used today.  With cloud, automation, AI, Robotics, “as a service approach” being the new buzz word, we need to understand how the process-driven approach evolved to identify and propose solutions that add values to the businesses. ITIL should be taught and used as a process-driven approach to generate IT Solutions which adds value to business.  I would like to take a few processes and lifecycle as examples to illustrate the point mentioned above BRM process: Conventional ITIL would say this process is responsible for managing the customer relations, complaints, satisfaction, requirement etc. Everything to do with customer management. Is this process helping guide the customer business strategy and in turn adding value to business? Was BRM process able to add value to Energy sector during the downturn? Did this process add value during recession to any of its customers? This is where ITIL should revisit the way each of these processes are taught and used in the modern context. Consider, a newly introduced process in ITIL say, Business Relationship Management (BRM) process. The purpose of the process is to maintain relationship between the service provider and the customer for understanding and meeting the business goals. This process is also mandated to do the market analysis and research so as to study changes happening in the customer business and customizes IT solutions which is more proactive than reactive. Service providers should realize that there should be a solution that is affordable during a customer downturn. Now let’s look at the service design lifecycle and the process, Service design lifecycle focuses on selecting the service from the catalogue and designing them to ensure continuity, availability, security, capacity and meets the SLA requirement agreed. Does this design lifecycle really address the challenges that the business could face in future? No not at all. The entire design lifecycle is based on developing IT requirement to meet the business needs. Should we not have a concept of alternative design which could be used by the business during the challenging times?  With more and more focus on cloud processes involved in the design, lifecycle approach has less relevance as people will take service which is designed. The only process of design lifecycle is the SLA which we will still need to agree on. Should we not have SLA which are more aligned with business benefit rather than measuring the IT success? Should we not have SLAs like average cost of tickets, new technology impact on % growth of business or % reduction of security incidents etc? In this section would like to touch upon the transition lifecycle. Does it meet today’s ever-changing need to transition quicker and faster? Do we even need to transition something at all or just have something new and improved? Should we need to have a view on transformation as part of Service transition? It is very important to realize that companies outsource because they need service providers to add value. Transitions should be closely coupled with the domain or the industry and the business process should be the prime focus rather than the IT lifecycle. A financial client and healthcare sector client may not require the same transition approach, it is very important to have a concept of Tailoring and Transforming in the Transition lifecycle to achieve a better result and add value for the business. The above holds good for Service Operation lifecycle. There has to be a process for customizing and transforming operations to ensure value addition is done for the business. There are two concepts that are very important for ITIL to contribute in the area of developing IT Solution. One is lessons learnt and second is governance.   Lack of learning from what has been done in the past and doing it in a better way for different business sectors is causing many service providers lose opportunity to propose a better solution. One company focuses on automation, and everyone does the same. Are we even factually looking at lessons captured during the journey of setting up a service and do we propose better solution next time around, do we pass the benefit of the lesson learnt to the existing client? The answer is no. “#ITIL helps our teams integrate more smoothly [across incident, problem, change], ensures our processes are seamless, and that the communication flow is that much quicker, concise, and efficient” – Stephen Yurack, @Innovapost https://t.co/PQJJE3kpRT #ITSM — AXELOS Best Practice (@AXELOS_GBP) April 19, 2018 Governance is something that has to be covered by ITIL to ensure better results are achieved. The general understanding is management is governance when in reality management and governance should be separated.  All the lifecycle processes should be governed and only then better results can be achieved. Lack of understanding of governance is the major reason for SLA being green and customer unhappy with the way his business is supported by IT. Conducting meetings, reviews and discussing action items is considered governance. Whereas the focus of the governance should be on IT adding value to the business. I have written these thoughts hoping ITIL is taught to meet the changing needs of the business rather than a set of best practices for IT service providers. ITIL should be a pathway for solutions rather than being a process-driven approach to run IT.
Rated 4.0/5 based on 2 customer reviews

ITIL Pathway For The Best IT Solutions

312
 ITIL Pathway For The Best IT Solutions

A service provider should be customer-centric.Why do we have most customers moving from one service provider to another or in-sourcing as the trend is suggesting? 

Is this because there is technology disruption happening which is new to even the service providers hence business wants to do it themselves 
                                                                                                         or 
keep moving from one to another service provider 
                                                                                                          or 
Is it that customer is not getting the solution that adds value to his business?

Expectations of customers from IT service provider in the last few years have changed and rightly so. In the very beginning, it was all about IT cost benefit which was achieved, the next phase was about process-driven approach which was again achieved (ITIL played a very important role in achieving it).

Now the expectation from the customer is about the value IT adds to the business, this is where ITIL should evolve from the way it is taught and used today. 

With cloud, automation, AI, Robotics, “as a service approach” being the new buzz word, we need to understand how the process-driven approach evolved to identify and propose solutions that add values to the businesses.

ITIL should be taught and used as a process-driven approach to generate IT Solutions which adds value to business. 


I would like to take a few processes and lifecycle as examples to illustrate the point mentioned above

BRM process: Conventional ITIL would say this process is responsible for managing the customer relations, complaints, satisfaction, requirement etc. Everything to do with customer management.

Is this process helping guide the customer business strategy and in turn adding value to business? Was BRM process able to add value to Energy sector during the downturn? Did this process add value during recession to any of its customers?

This is where ITIL should revisit the way each of these processes are taught and used in the modern context.

Consider, a newly introduced process in ITIL say, Business Relationship Management (BRM) process. The purpose of the process is to maintain relationship between the service provider and the customer for understanding and meeting the business goals.

This process is also mandated to do the market analysis and research so as to study changes happening in the customer business and customizes IT solutions which is more proactive than reactive. Service providers should realize that there should be a solution that is affordable during a customer downturn.

Now let’s look at the service design lifecycle and the process, Service design lifecycle focuses on selecting the service from the catalogue and designing them to ensure continuity, availability, security, capacity and meets the SLA requirement agreed.

Does this design lifecycle really address the challenges that the business could face in future? No not at all. The entire design lifecycle is based on developing IT requirement to meet the business needs. Should we not have a concept of alternative design which could be used by the business during the challenging times? 

With more and more focus on cloud processes involved in the design, lifecycle approach has less relevance as people will take service which is designed. The only process of design lifecycle is the SLA which we will still need to agree on. Should we not have SLA which are more aligned with business benefit rather than measuring the IT success? Should we not have SLAs like average cost of tickets, new technology impact on % growth of business or % reduction of security incidents etc?

In this section would like to touch upon the transition lifecycle. Does it meet today’s ever-changing need to transition quicker and faster? Do we even need to transition something at all or just have something new and improved? Should we need to have a view on transformation as part of Service transition?

It is very important to realize that companies outsource because they need service providers to add value. Transitions should be closely coupled with the domain or the industry and the business process should be the prime focus rather than the IT lifecycle.

A financial client and healthcare sector client may not require the same transition approach, it is very important to have a concept of Tailoring and Transforming in the Transition lifecycle to achieve a better result and add value for the business.

The above holds good for Service Operation lifecycle. There has to be a process for customizing and transforming operations to ensure value addition is done for the business.

There are two concepts that are very important for ITIL to contribute in the area of developing IT Solution. One is lessons learnt and second is governance.  

Lack of learning from what has been done in the past and doing it in a better way for different business sectors is causing many service providers lose opportunity to propose a better solution. One company focuses on automation, and everyone does the same. Are we even factually looking at lessons captured during the journey of setting up a service and do we propose better solution next time around, do we pass the benefit of the lesson learnt to the existing client? The answer is no.


Governance is something that has to be covered by ITIL to ensure better results are achieved. The general understanding is management is governance when in reality management and governance should be separated. 

All the lifecycle processes should be governed and only then better results can be achieved. Lack of understanding of governance is the major reason for SLA being green and customer unhappy with the way his business is supported by IT. Conducting meetings, reviews and discussing action items is considered governance. Whereas the focus of the governance should be on IT adding value to the business.

I have written these thoughts hoping ITIL is taught to meet the changing needs of the business rather than a set of best practices for IT service providers. ITIL should be a pathway for solutions rather than being a process-driven approach to run IT.

Anand

Anand Naik

Blog author

Versatile and highly skilled IT Infrastructure professional with 12yrs of experience in Operations, Transition, Transformation, Project Management, Process Consulting, Solutioning and Training

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 comments

Paul Matlock 30 Apr 2018

I am feeling much blessed to be here and reading your thought provoking blog. It has truly increased my knowledge. I will surely come again and again to overcome my thirst for knowledge.

Nikhil Udupi 28 May 2018

Excellent article Anand. You have been a great mentor for many aspirants in the field of infrastructure operations. Hope to see many such informative articles from you.

Suggested Blogs

ITSM Gets Agile With ITIL® V4

The influx of new technologies has initiated a steep growth in the demand for a more modern, structured IT service management (ITSM) framework. Emerging technologies like blockchain, artificial intelligence, internet of things (IoT) and many more are shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolution. A report by CompTIA projects the global information technology industry will grow at a rate of 3.7% in 2020, and that IT jobs are at risk as companies move toward automation. However, with multi-faceted certifications like ITIL®, the IT teams will be better equipped to handle more responsibilities overarching the IT industry. What is ITIL®?ITIL® (an acronym for the Information Technology Infrastructure Library) is a common framework that standardized global best practices in IT. It is used globally by millions of practitioners and is relied upon by 90% of the Financial Times Stock Exchange 500 to optimize their IT operations. Its framework equips a service provider with a clear capability model, aligning them to the business strategy and customer needs. Yet, with shifting work practices, the silo-model of ITIL® has been challenging its practitioners to evolve. With its new version, the ITIL® V4, some of these problem areas are addressed.  Carefully curated with the help of 12 lead architects, 61 authors, and hundreds of IT practitioners, the latest additions incorporate a range of approaches from DevOps, Agile to SRE (Site Reliability Engineering). So what exactly sets apart ITIL® 4? Defining ITIL® V4 with agilityTraditionally, ITSM focused on continual service improvement (CSI) by collecting feedback and coming up with improvements in a project plan that spans anywhere between 6-12 months. However, with the advent of digital transformation, this approach has become obsolete. With its delayed turn-around-time or improvement model, customer-retention becomes difficult, and the overall pace is hampered as well.  The introduction of agility to this model ensures shorter cycles of projects and constant iterations to meet the customers’ or end-users’ expectations. Running 4-week sprints becomes a regular process, with mini-projects being stacked alongside – then passed to the Scrum Masters. Not only does this streamline the feedback mechanism to ensure continuous improvement, but it also helps in tracking the success and optimal usage of resources.  It is as simple as this: instead of doing something for 6 months, finding where it failed and then reworking on those aspects; using agile methodology one can continuously rework on what is wrong, while also progressing with the project and enhancing what is right. A perfect example of this is user testing and MVP (minimum viable product) in the case of IT services.  Agile also allows the setting of short-term goals aligned to the current business needs. With the entire team aligned to the end-result ploughing improvements on-the-go, overall productivity is also increased.  Breaking down silosITIL® 4 focuses on creating a shift in the ITSM mindset, both culturally and in the working methodologies, by breaking down barriers and silo-working. It helps in fostering a collaborative work environment right from the top and nurtures a holistic approach to work. By documenting processes formally and keeping track of consistency and progress, the dependencies involved in each process are transparent. Each team works to its strengths and supports the other in its shortcomings, creating a collaborative environment. When such structures are implemented at the top level, it is bound to trickle down to the remaining parts of the organization.  Benefits of ITIL® V 4ITIL® V4 has been primarily built on four dimensions of service management – people, products, partners, and processes. While the processes were largely overlooked by the previous versions, the ITIL® V4 embraces the core values of other frameworks like Lean, Agile and DevOps, making it more flexible and beneficial to the niche IT services.  With the support of ITIL® V4, ITSM is more structured around development processes and its adoption of agile methodologies creates space and autonomy in work within a consistent framework. Change is imperative for the growth of any organization, and ITIL® 4 helps them navigate it. Shifting gears from process-led delivery to value-driven delivery, ITIL® 4 ensures faster quality and quick growth for people and organizations.
Rated 4.5/5 based on 0 customer reviews
3466
ITSM Gets Agile With ITIL® V4

The influx of new technologies has initiated a ste... Read More

5 ITIL® Skills That Set You Apart

The IT Infrastructure Library or ITIL® is a collection of vast data describing a framework of best practices for delivering IT services. Since its inception in the 1980s, the process has gone through many changes, keeping up with the latest technologies in the IT space. The latest addition was ITIL® 4 and encompasses five books with various processes and stages of the IT service lifecycle. Its systematic approach helps businesses manage risk, strengthen customer relations and build cost-effective strategies for a sustainable IT environment.  Demand for ITIL®As new opportunities continue to emerge for IT professionals at the organizational level, companies are leaning towards recruiting or training individuals with higher skillsets or IT certification. Certifications like the ITIL® not only prepare IT professionals for such organizational-level processes but also project a wider landscape of opportunities. Globally, techies or project experts have received over a 15% hike in their salaries after boosting their resumes with an ITIL® certification. ITIL® ranks 7th among all the top-paying IT certifications, with an average salary of $120,556, according to the Global Knowledge 2019 IT Skills and Salary Report. So, what is it about ITIL® that makes it one of the most in-demand certification courses? 5 ITIL® skills that set you apart 1. Worldwide Recognition The ITIL® framework is professionally recognized and provides a common language of practical, proven guidance for establishing ITSM, with continual growth as well as consistency. It is used globally by millions of practitioners and giant conglomerates. Axelos reports that 90% of the Financial Times Stock Exchange 500 companies rely on ITIL® to run their operations. This opens a window of opportunities for individuals to explore. 2. Skills for high-quality delivery As the ITIL® framework contains tools that power collaboration within IT teams and delivering value across a business, these skills can be used in different projects, teams, and organizations.  3. Alignment to disruptive technologiesThe fourth version of ITIL® bridges the best practices of ITIL® with the Fourth Industrial Revolution or Industry 4.0. The new framework enables organizations to smoothly transition into digital technologies and provides practical and flexible support for this adaption. The framework focuses on collaboration, transparency, automating where possible, and working holistically. Emerging technologies like robotics, artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things (IoT) and more are crucial for businesses to grow but come with their limitations. ITIL® also encompasses ways to deal with their iterative nature.  4. Inculcates a proactive culture The ITIL® framework trains individuals to focus on customers’ expectations and user experience. It helps them plan for contingencies and to take appropriate measures to prevent them from recurring. It also improves the overall service delivery quality, developing a new proactive culture.  5. Goal-oriented strategies One of the chief areas that ITIL® trains an individual/team for, is the focus on driving business. With the emphasis on getting better return-on-investment (ROI) by improving business competence, productivity, and customer-relationships, individuals tend to look for cost-efficient strategies. This not only helps in optimizing resources but also generates a holistic approach towards work. The importance of always learningITIL® enhances continuous growth through its practices. The framework aligns with the future of IT by merging business and technology – how it is working today and how it will work going forward with other methodologies like Agile, DevOps and digital transformation as well. For individuals, the ITIL® skills don’t just set them apart with a distinct resume but also let them implement successful growth-oriented practices in real-time.
Rated 4.5/5 based on 32 customer reviews
4569
5 ITIL® Skills That Set You Apart

The IT Infrastructure Library or ITIL® is a colle... Read More

ITIL 4: Embedding safety culture and behavior

How well prepared are organizations for information security and risk management in an increasingly cloud computing-based world that is also volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous (VUCA)? The rush to use cloud services sometimes means organizations are not perceptive about the risks. Sounding that “it’s in the cloud, therefore its safe” is wrong, though vendors may claim it is. This is why it’s overriding for ITIL® 4 to have dedicated management practices for information security and risk management; helping enterprises to fabricate healthy cyber behaviors and ensure all employees are involved. It’s also important that external suppliers embrace these best practices to manage overall risk. Balancing security and freedom to innovate Both information security and risk management are everyone’s job in the organization. In high-velocity IT environments, development teams are operating with agility and multiple, regular changes. Although, once they embed healthy information security behaviors, risk management congruous with basic company culture and poses no problem to innovation. This supports the ITIL 4 service value chain, fortifythat everything the organization is doing to co-create value for customers is secure at each point in the chain. The information security management practice helps people perceive the boundaries to work within and tools for solving specific product functionalities for the customer, such as anti-virus, malware protection and supplier access. And, eventually, it’s possible to wangle the cyber security maturity model: Identifying the risks/information vulnerable to threats Assessing how to comply Measuring and monitoring with key performance indicators Establishing continuous programmes for healthy cyber behaviors Transforming the organization with a strong security culture. Balancing risk management and innovationIf an organization’s risk appetite is communicated effectively from C-level, then it becomes the standard approach and shouldn’t inhibit innovation. ITIL 4’s risk management practice evince that, on a daily basis, we are windswept to different types of risks; this means leaders need to nurture both culture and behavior to curtail risk while, at the same time, co-creating value. Having a clear converge on the management practice accredits organizations to identify risk, know how to address it and repeat this process. A major factor highlighted in ITIL 4 is the need to embrace change: what is best for an organization in a VUCA world and how to adapt to the anxiety that comes from the interminable cycle of change. For this, enterprises need to burgeon the culture and behavior among their people to be reliable but also to give them the credence to make mistakes and the ability to fix and learn from them.
Rated 4.5/5 based on 45 customer reviews
17368
ITIL 4: Embedding safety culture and behavior

How well prepared are organizations for informatio... Read More

Useful links