Search

How is Agile different from conventional approaches?

There are many project management methodologies in the market at present that follow conventional project management techniques to plan and execute a project. Some organizations might find these to be useful and still abide by them. But, there is one such methodology that does things differently. It provides a fresh set of rules and principles that are light years away from conventional approaches. A comparison of the conventional approach and how agile carries out the same concept in an updated manner that is suitable to the conditions in which projects are carried out today. 1 Conventional approach: Plan all tasks and time required for each task in advance and set a deadline for the completion of the project. Problem: Research suggests that in most cases we tend to assign more time to a process or assign lesser time to it. In other cases, we give each project a ‘safety time’ which is the extra time assigned to each task. All these approaches ironically tend to delay the project and cross the deadline. Agile approach: Instead of making a master plan, make smaller plans in each stage of the project and update the plan once the previous task is completed. This helps to keep the team motivated and the work gets done at a faster rate. 2 Conventional approach: A large team should work concurrently to get the work done faster. Problem: Large teams lead to a lot of confusion. Hence, they may be confused as to which plan to abide by. Agile approach: Make smaller teams of 3-9 people. This way, the team can chart their own plan and work towards it together so that the work gets done in a shorter period of time. 3 Conventional approach: Hold long corporate meetings on a daily basis to discuss all the tasks and progress made in each task. The meeting could go on for hours. Problem: In these types of meetings, a lot of time is wasted on discussing the tasks to be completed all over again. The time lost could be used to work on the project instead. Agile approach: Hold ‘sprint sessions’. The sprint sessions last for ten minutes. In these sessions, the small team should discuss only three questions and continue with the task at hand. These are: 1) Which task was accomplished the previous day? 2) What is the agenda for today? 3) What are the possible snags in the tasks for the next day? This approach improves efficiency and produces productive results from the meetings. 4 Conventional approach: All the decisions and rules set at the beginning of the meeting is final and should be followed till the completion of the project. The rules cannot be changed in the process. It is rigid. Problem: At times, due to unexpected reasons the project might face issues from external sources. To finish the project on time, certain alterations might be required in the master plan. Any new changes suggested by the customer cannot be included. Agile approach: The plan changes every week or every two weeks depending on the organisation. This allows the team to alter the project as required depending on the changes suggested by the customer or problems faced due to technical snags. It is flexible. 5 Conventional approach: Customer interaction is limited. The project planner and developer is different. The project planner jots down all the customer requirements makes the plan and sends it to the developer. The developer develops the software based on the instructions of the project planner. Problem: There is no communication between the developer and the customer. The project planner may not understand the working process of the developer and might make a plan that is not suitable to the developer. Agile approach: Developer directly interacts with the customer and charters the required plan. He can update it according to his working procedures. Since the project planner and developer is the same person, the delays in the project will be reduced. These are the unique methods of the Agile framework in handling a project. It provides an updated approach that is suitable to the working conditions of the various organisations that require project management methodologies.

How is Agile different from conventional approaches?

351
How is Agile different from conventional approaches?

There are many project management methodologies in the market at present that follow conventional project management techniques to plan and execute a project. Some organizations might find these to be useful and still abide by them. But, there is one such methodology that does things differently. It provides a fresh set of rules and principles that are light years away from conventional approaches. A comparison of the conventional approach and how agile carries out the same concept in an updated manner that is suitable to the conditions in which projects are carried out today.

1
Conventional approach: Plan all tasks and time required for each task in advance and set a deadline for the completion of the project.
Problem: Research suggests that in most cases we tend to assign more time to a process or assign lesser time to it. In other cases, we give each project a ‘safety time’ which is the extra time assigned to each task. All these approaches ironically tend to delay the project and cross the deadline.
Agile approach: Instead of making a master plan, make smaller plans in each stage of the project and update the plan once the previous task is completed. This helps to keep the team motivated and the work gets done at a faster rate.

2
Conventional approach: A large team should work concurrently to get the work done faster.
Problem: Large teams lead to a lot of confusion. Hence, they may be confused as to which plan to abide by.
Agile approach: Make smaller teams of 3-9 people. This way, the team can chart their own plan and work towards it together so that the work gets done in a shorter period of time.

3
Conventional approach: Hold long corporate meetings on a daily basis to discuss all the tasks and progress made in each task. The meeting could go on for hours.
Problem: In these types of meetings, a lot of time is wasted on discussing the tasks to be completed all over again. The time lost could be used to work on the project instead.
Agile approach: Hold ‘sprint sessions’. The sprint sessions last for ten minutes. In these sessions, the small team should discuss only three questions and continue with the task at hand. These are:

1) Which task was accomplished the previous day?
2) What is the agenda for today?
3) What are the possible snags in the tasks for the next day?
This approach improves efficiency and produces productive results from the meetings.

4
Conventional approach: All the decisions and rules set at the beginning of the meeting is final and should be followed till the completion of the project. The rules cannot be changed in the process. It is rigid.
Problem: At times, due to unexpected reasons the project might face issues from external sources. To finish the project on time, certain alterations might be required in the master plan. Any new changes suggested by the customer cannot be included.
Agile approach: The plan changes every week or every two weeks depending on the organisation. This allows the team to alter the project as required depending on the changes suggested by the customer or problems faced due to technical snags. It is flexible.

5
Conventional approach:
Customer interaction is limited. The project planner and developer is different. The project planner jots down all the customer requirements makes the plan and sends it to the developer. The developer develops the software based on the instructions of the project planner.
Problem: There is no communication between the developer and the customer. The project planner may not understand the working process of the developer and might make a plan that is not suitable to the developer.
Agile approach: Developer directly interacts with the customer and charters the required plan. He can update it according to his working procedures. Since the project planner and developer is the same person, the delays in the project will be reduced.

These are the unique methods of the Agile framework in handling a project. It provides an updated approach that is suitable to the working conditions of the various organisations that require project management methodologies.

KnowledgeHut

KnowledgeHut

Author

KnowledgeHut is an outcome-focused global ed-tech company. We help organizations and professionals unlock excellence through skills development. We offer training solutions under the people and process, data science, full-stack development, cybersecurity, future technologies and digital transformation verticals.
Website : https://www.knowledgehut.com

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Suggested Blogs

Best Practices of Scaled Agile Framework - Agile Management

The enterprises have many different frameworks and methodologies to choose from once they decide to adopt the ‘Agile’ approach for project/product development. Designed by the Scaled Agile Inc, the Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe®) is an Agile software-development framework. Earlier, the Agile development methodologies were used on a trial basis for various projects at an enterprise level. The development team experimented in making an efficient Agile method suitable to work in their environment. This resulted in evaluation of methods that worked and that didn’t, which ultimately led to the development of various frameworks and strategies for the adoption of the Scaled Agile Framework. Within the last few years, the Scaled Agile adoption has become popular amongst many enterprises. The two most important responsibilities of management are measuring improvement and ROI. The management needs to choose a solution that best equips with their business model and speed up the delivery and release phases. With these benefits coming handy, more and more professionals are practising lean and Agile methods and implementing it in the enterprises. The Scaled Agile Framework is a highly structured and is mainly used in larger enterprises and is primarily used to for agile development. It is an increasingly popular framework that has been successfully implements in enterprises. The nine principles of SAFe® include as follows: 1. Taking an economic view 2. Applying systems thinking 3. Assuming variability by preserving options 4. Incremental built with fast and integrated learning cycles 5. Building the foundation of milestones on objective evaluation of working systems 6. Visualising and limiting WIP, managing queue lengths and reducing batch sizes 7. Synchronising with cross-domain planning by applying cadence (timing) 8. Establishing deep-rooted motivation of knowledge workers 9. Decentralising the decision making There are three levels in SAFe®, and they’re as follows: • Team All the SAFe® teams are the Agile teams consisting of 5–9 people working in 2-week scrums. They have skills to define, develop, test, and deliver value using XP (Extreme Programming) methods. Unlike the traditional development scrums, they work in collaboration. • Program At Program level, 5–10 SAFe® teams consisting of 50–125 persons create an “Agile Train Release” comprising of stakeholders and development teams. They put in sync their iteration boundaries and facilitate delivery of integrated working systems every 2 weeks. The SAFe®defines the Agile Release Train (ART), which in every 10 weeks (5 iterations) delivers a Potentially Shippable Increment (PSI). The PSIs provides a steady cadence (timing) for the development cycle. • Portfolio The lean–Agile budgeting mechanisms are budgeted by a portfolio, which is a collection of value streams. The portfolio management requires program management, investment funding, strategy, and governance. A portfolio is associated with the enterprise strategy in terms of strategic themes. Epics that define large-development initiatives are captured and analysed by a portfolio Kanban system. There are business epics that are customer facing, and then there are architectural epics that are technology solutions. How the practices of the Scaled Agile Framework benefit the organisation? SAFe® is considered as a framework based on Agile Development, Lean, and Systems Thinking, which has gained worldwide recognition throughout the large corporations and enterprises. Following are the benefits of adopting the Scaled Agile Framework for your organisation: 1. SAFe® allows implementation large team programs and portfolios Initially, the organisations adopt Agile approach and experiment it by its implementation with small teams. After gaining moderate success with small teams, often the organisations would try to increase the size by aligning various teams, programs, and various departments in an organisation to promote collaboration and efficiency in development and shipment of the product. By identifying the key Agile functionalities, Lean and Systems Thinking that scale well, SAFe® addresses all these issues. 2. SAFe® outlines a consistent approach for planning, execution, and delivery of value It becomes difficult for large organisations when numerous Agile teams are involved, because the teams might operate on different cadences (timing), or might use various Agile frameworks, or might rely on varying tools for managing the Agile lifecycle, or the teams might have adopted different technique practices. SAFe® makes use of ART (Agile Release Train), which collaborates various Agile teams on a consistent cadence for every 8–10 weeks. It is known as a Program Increment (PI). This enables the teams of the organisations get together and uncover, plan, and address dependencies of the teams and the risks that might arise. All the teams of ART make use of best practices such as the Scrum-of-Scrums during each PI. At the end of every Project Increment, the ART does the analysis of what was done in the past 8–12 weeks. 3. SAFe® addresses roles and responsibilities across Team, Program, and Portfolio levels Adopting and implementing Agile causes a drastic change across the organisation, which can raise questions regarding the current and new functions. SAFe® addresses all these questions across the various levels. 4. SAFe® provides a framework to bring consistency in strategy and alignment to the program and team levels In an organisation, maintaining an overall alignment with the vision and strategy is often a challenge faced by enterprise-scale software development. It becomes difficult to arrange various business departments with similar strategies, and if that is achieved, the problem still persists to communicate that strategy at the team level. SAFe® provides an architecture to implement Agile, Lean, and Systems Thinking consistently to various levels in an organisation. 5. SAFe® improves product development lead times SAFe® is a well-documented approach that applies its principles, benefits, and values to the wider enterprise. More and more large corporations have understood how to scale Agile to lessen the time required for product development and improve the release time of their product compared to their market competitors. SAFe® provides an extensive set of functionalities that can be applied in an enterprise to successfully scale Agile.
1821
Best Practices of Scaled Agile Framework - Agile M...

The enterprises have many different frameworks and... Read More

Why An Agile Project Management Certification Is The Right Choice?

Professional certification courses for Agile methodologies is available for IT professionals who have worked in Agile projects or who have worked in complex software projects. These certification courses are designed to test your knowledge and competence of the Agile framework. Though there are several Agile-related certification courses available in the market, most of them can be categorized under the umbrella of 2 main categories namely, Project management-based or Scrum-based. This article discusses the details of these 2 categories of Agile certifications and recommends which is the right one to pursue. About Agile Project Management certification The purpose of Agile project management is on developing software solutions incrementally to enable project teams to respond effectively to change in customer requirement, while delivering the product in quicker time to the customer. A certification course in Agile project management is designed to explain the foundation of successful agile projects and on how to manage the project from the start to its completion. An IT professional, certified in Agile project management, has the following benefits: Develops an advanced level of knowledge about Agile and can apply the project management methodology to any software project. Differentiate between the project management principles between traditional and Agile project environments, and apply the same to different work scenarios. Promote a trustful collaboration between the business owners and the Agile development teams, while providing the management day-to-day visibility into the progress of the project. Experienced IT professionals can also combine the learnings of traditional project management methods and Agile methods, thus providing them more control over a fast-evolving business environment. Improve the success rate and time-to-market duration of software releases. Agile project management certifications, such as the Agile Certified Practitioner (ACP) course from the Project Management Institute (PMI) require students who have real-world experience of being part of an Agile project team and provides the students working knowledge of multiple Agile methodologies including Scrum, Kanban, Lean, and others. Additionally, certified ACP holders must earn 30 professional development units every 3 years to maintain their status. About Scrum-based certification While project management-based certification provides a single certification credential, Scrum-based certification is divided into multiple certification courses based on the role being played by the individual in the Agile project. Scrum-based certification offers courses for the following roles: Certified ScrumMaster Certified Scrum Product Owner Certified Scrum Developer Certified Scrum Professional Scrum-based certification program, such as the Scrum Alliance, is designed for software professionals, who can support the adoption of Scrum framework and its benefits in software development. Scrum-based certification is important for individuals from the software industry, who want to grow in an iterative software development environment. Certified knowledge of the Agile methodology can boost their career prospects. Which certification program is better? Gaining certification accreditation for both project management and Scrum can be beneficial for software experts, who want to manage projects for different types of software companies and can benefit from the different project management frameworks. Knowledge of multiple PM frameworks like Scrum, Lean, and XP can only be gained by pursuing both categories of courses. Besides this, let us look at a comparison of these Agile certification courses in the following parameters: Industry orientation A PM-certified individual is oriented towards being both industry agnostic and product agnostic, meaning their specialization is not restricted to any particular industry, or products that can functions on multiple platforms (example, mobile phone and desktop). The Scrum-certified individual, who typically was focussed on software development, is now product agnostic. Job preference The PM-certified individuals are looking at a career as a project manager, as many software industry recruiters demand Agile certification in project manager openings. A Scrum-certified individual is seeking growth and opportunities in the field of software development or to be a Scrum expert in any Agile software project environment. Recertification requirements Individuals certified in Agile PM programs, require to take a recertification (or continued education) on a 3-year cycle. Individuals certified in Scrum-based programs, require to take a recertification (or continued education) on a 2-year cycle. Eligibility Project managers or any team members, who hold any Project manager professional certificate, can benefit the most from the Agile PM certification program. Software team members, who have working knowledge of the Scrum methodology and have been part of Scrum-based projects, can benefit the most from the Scrum certification programs. Conclusion Depending upon the student’s previous experience and future growth map, either (or even both) of these Agile-based certification courses can be pursued for gaining recognition in a rapidly-evolving software development environment.
6711
Why An Agile Project Management Certification Is T...

Professional certification courses for Agile metho... Read More

How SAFe® Became Pioneer In The World Of Framework?

SAFe® principles and practices aim to provide guidance on successfully leading agile projects. It is the approach that helps scale agile to the highest level being the enterprise level. Leading SAFe® is a known Certification that teaches concepts on agile and value delivery through scaled agile framework. It provides insights on lean mindset and approaches to deliver agile release trains. Why companies choose SAFe®, now this is the trending topic in agile members. One of its key focus is also on how to develop and implement agile approaches organisation wide and align team goals to enterprise goals. A major contributor to the wide adoption of Scale Agile Framework Certification and Training is that most of the success on agile so far is based on scrum. While scrum works effectively for small and medium sized organisations where it is relatively easier to manage teams. A greater challenge is posed by large enterprises. These organisations usually have bigger teams and varying team cultures. SAFe® training helps in articulating the ways and approaches that support scaling agile. Multi team and multi project queries are a part of the scaled agile framework Certification giving a methodology that helps guide on how to manage the flow of value from the strategic ideation to actual release in the product. SAFe® brings three critical levels to align their processes and goal guidelines so that they ultimately support scaling agile. These levels are portfolio level, programming level and finally team level. While portfolio level focuses on the strategic decisions, it is the program level team that handles estimations and analysis to decide user story deployment approach. Team level is responsible for the development, testing, and deployment of agile trains in line with all the strategic and operational inputs that flow from above levels. Lean Thinking also plays a critical role in successful Agile Implementations. This mindset is the core of SAFe® Certification. The main goal of introducing lean mindset is to encourage delivery of value to the end user with utilisation of shortest lead time. All key variables of bandwidth, time and effort are organised to ultimately support the goal of giving results within a shorter timeline. Amongst the pillars supporting the concept of SAFe®, a key ideal is respect within the team. Despite the fact that every organisation big or small carriers its own culture, a primary focus on respect enables team members to be open and discuss challenges. Respect is also important to maintain because in agile individuals are empowered to continually focus on improving their methods to deliver better with the agreement from the team. Value Delivery is another reason for this framework gaining more acceptance. The importance of value delivery is evident as each iteration uses some feedback from previous iterations to further improve the end-product. This way the focus is also on continuous improvement of the product through development helps in better prioritization and managing queue of deliverable pieces. Being holistic is also an advantage that SAFe® framework carries. It helps to give a bird’s eye view of all the complex work that happens in the Development and release process. Attention to alignment with top level Strategic goals of the enterprise gives work greater visibility and Helps focus on continuous improvement with each deployment. SAFe® framework is indeed the complete framework for enterprises that want to move away from the traditional waterfall to agile. Since scaling is the biggest challenge of scrum, SAFe® helps to align all targets to ensure that value delivery reaches end user in the shorter span of time and with lean mindset. Supporting lean also helps teams to be more efficient and diverts focus on strategic and iterative improvements sooner than traditional waterfall approach. Continuous process improvements originating from teams are also encouraged to bring greater efficiencies much sooner in value delivery.
3590
How SAFe® Became Pioneer In The World Of Frame...

SAFe® principles and practices aim to provide gui... Read More

Useful links