This Festive Season, enjoy 10% discount on all courses Use Coupon NY10 Click to Copy

Search

How to Check Whether Your Agile Process is on the Wrong Track

Today, Agile is a real buzzword and every person involved in software development knows what it means. The Agile project management methodology has literally revolutionized software development, making it faster, better, and more cost-effective. The key principles of Agile bring benefits to investors (better ROI), development teams (streamlined workflow), and end-users (high-quality products). The majority of software development companies in the world practice Agile. There’s a good reason for that: according to the “11th State of Agile” report made by VisionOne, the success rate for the projects delivered with the help of Agile stood at 98%! Yet, some projects still fail despite the adoption of Agile. Apparently, Agile isn’t a magic wand that performs miracles on its own. This software development methodology must be applied properly. Several grave mistakes in the implementation of Agile, and your project is likely to end up behind the eight ball, which means financial and reputational losses for your company. So, how can you check whether something goes wrong with your Agile process? 9 Signs That Your Agile Process Goes Wrong The Agile methodology seems to be clear and simple in terms of theory, but there are many challenges companies face when implementing Agile practices. According to the pre-cited report, 47% of respondents said the lack of skills and experience was a serious difficulty. If you wish to avoid a failure, make sure your Agile process goes well and your team’s performance is high. Here’s a list of 9 most common signs that your Agile process is on the wrong track. Sign #1 No Sprint Retrospectives Retrospectives are crucial for Agile software development methodology and they must never be skipped. Sprint retrospectives allow Agile teams to look behind and analyze what went okay and what went wrong during a sprint. All team members can share their opinions and suggest some improvements to the workflow. Retrospectives help teams learn from their own experience and hone their workflow to perfection. Sign #2 Long Stand-up Meetings The vast majority of Agile teams (particularly those who use Scrum) hold daily stand-up meetings that help team members synchronize and plan their activities. Typical stand-up meetings mustn’t last longer than 15 minutes, but many teams spend far more time on them. As a result, stand-ups become nothing but a waste of time. Also, make sure to manage daily stand-ups correctly. That’s what team members have to tell during a stand-up: What they accomplished during the previous day; What they’re planning to do this day; What difficulties (if any) they faced. A stand-up meeting shouldn’t be turned into a discussion of irrelevant topics. Sign #3 Improper Product Backlog Management The product backlog must be properly managed and it’s the responsibility of a Product Owner (PO). A PO is an intermediary between a stakeholder and a development team. A PO has to define the tasks in the backlog and prioritize them according to their business value. If there’s no PO and your product backlog is managed by the team, the collaboration between your team and a stakeholder will be insufficient. Consequently, the stakeholder might not like the final version of the product. Sign #4 Failure to Deliver Product Increments After Each Sprint Incremental development is the core of Agile methodology. At the end of each sprint, your team should deliver a potentially shippable increment (fully coded and tested) of a product. Actually, a shippable increment is a measure of success for Agile teams. If your team fails to deliver a shippable increment at the end of a sprint, it means that your Agile process doesn’t work properly. The solution to this problem is a complete restructuring of your workflow and team. Sign #5 Story Points Treated as Goals Story Points estimation is, probably, the most popular technique for measuring Agile team’s velocity. During sprint planning meetings, team members collectively decide how many points each task is worth. Therefore, Story Points are informal agreements that help teams estimate the amount of effort required for developing a particular feature. Story Points are subjective: the same task can be given three points by one team but five points by another. However, some teams tend to treat Story Points as measures of success. In this case, team members would be focused on reaching a specific number of points instead of concentrating on delivering value. Your team might end uplooking productive rather than really being productive. Remember that Story Points don’t matter but value does. Sign #6 Incorrect Velocity Tracking In some companies, managers compare individual velocity of Agile team members by counting the number of Story Points each of them achieves. Though this method sounds reasonable, it’s at odds with the essence of Agile, which is all about collaboration. Team members work together and, as it’s been mentioned above, they must be focused on delivering value, not on achieving a certain number of Story Points. Sign #7 Urgent Tasks That Interrupt Workflow Probably, every development team sometimes needs to handle urgent tasks (e.g. adding new features to a product) that aren’t in a sprint backlog. Such interruptions distract the team and make a negative impact on productivity, since the team might fail to reach the sprint goal. Interruptions should be managed by a Product Owner. Once some urgent tasks appear, a PO has to add them to the product backlog and re-prioritize it. Sign #8 Large Number of Uncompleted Tasks Sometimes, development teams seem to fulfill all the tasks in their sprint backlogs, while most tasks aren’t fully done. Needless to say, incomplete tasks will have to be done during the next sprint. Though fulfilling all the tasks in a sprint backlog may be challenging, it’s still better to have 90% of them fully done rather than having 100% of tasks 90% done. Sign #9 Technical Debt Very often, developers need to make changes to their projects. The reasons may be different: bug fixing, refactoring, or redesigning. Accumulating technical debt is a grave mistake that immensely reduces a team’s productivity. Instead, technical changes must be carried out as soon as possible since it’s much easier to handle them within a sprint rather than during the final stages of the development process. Don’t Just Practice Agile, Be Agile A common mistake of many software development companies is treating Agile merely as a methodology. However, this view isn’t quite correct. A person truly dedicated to software development should have an “Agile mindset” that includes the following: Desire to learn; Focus on team success; No fear of mistakes. That’s why the implementation of the best Agile practices isn’t enough. Team members should shift their way of thinking to deliver successful state-of-the-art products.  
Rated 4.0/5 based on 20 customer reviews

How to Check Whether Your Agile Process is on the Wrong Track

306
  • by Gleb B
  • 04th Jun, 2017
  • Last updated on 13th Dec, 2018
How to Check Whether Your Agile Process is on the Wrong Track

Today, Agile is a real buzzword and every person involved in software development knows what it means. The Agile project management methodology has literally revolutionized software development, making it faster, better, and more cost-effective. The key principles of Agile bring benefits to investors (better ROI), development teams (streamlined workflow), and end-users (high-quality products).

The majority of software development companies in the world practice Agile. There’s a good reason for that: according to the “11th State of Agile” report made by VisionOne, the success rate for the projects delivered with the help of Agile stood at 98%!

Yet, some projects still fail despite the adoption of Agile. Apparently, Agile isn’t a magic wand that performs miracles on its own. This software development methodology must be applied properly. Several grave mistakes in the implementation of Agile, and your project is likely to end up behind the eight ball, which means financial and reputational losses for your company. So, how can you check whether something goes wrong with your Agile process?

9 Signs That Your Agile Process Goes Wrong

The Agile methodology seems to be clear and simple in terms of theory, but there are many challenges companies face when implementing Agile practices. According to the pre-cited report, 47% of respondents said the lack of skills and experience was a serious difficulty. If you wish to avoid a failure, make sure your Agile process goes well and your team’s performance is high.

Here’s a list of 9 most common signs that your Agile process is on the wrong track.

Sign #1 No Sprint Retrospectives

Retrospectives are crucial for Agile software development methodology and they must never be skipped. Sprint retrospectives allow Agile teams to look behind and analyze what went okay and what went wrong during a sprint. All team members can share their opinions and suggest some improvements to the workflow. Retrospectives help teams learn from their own experience and hone their workflow to perfection.

Sign #2 Long Stand-up Meetings

The vast majority of Agile teams (particularly those who use Scrum) hold daily stand-up meetings that help team members synchronize and plan their activities. Typical stand-up meetings mustn’t last longer than 15 minutes, but many teams spend far more time on them. As a result, stand-ups become nothing but a waste of time.

  • Also, make sure to manage daily stand-ups correctly. That’s what team members have to tell during a stand-up:
  • What they accomplished during the previous day;
  • What they’re planning to do this day;
  • What difficulties (if any) they faced.
  • A stand-up meeting shouldn’t be turned into a discussion of irrelevant topics.

Sign #3 Improper Product Backlog Management

The product backlog must be properly managed and it’s the responsibility of a Product Owner (PO). A PO is an intermediary between a stakeholder and a development team. A PO has to define the tasks in the backlog and prioritize them according to their business value.

If there’s no PO and your product backlog is managed by the team, the collaboration between your team and a stakeholder will be insufficient. Consequently, the stakeholder might not like the final version of the product.

Sign #4 Failure to Deliver Product Increments After Each Sprint

Incremental development is the core of Agile methodology. At the end of each sprint, your team should deliver a potentially shippable increment (fully coded and tested) of a product. Actually, a shippable increment is a measure of success for Agile teams.

If your team fails to deliver a shippable increment at the end of a sprint, it means that your Agile process doesn’t work properly. The solution to this problem is a complete restructuring of your workflow and team.

Sign #5 Story Points Treated as Goals

Story Points estimation is, probably, the most popular technique for measuring Agile team’s velocity. During sprint planning meetings, team members collectively decide how many points each task is worth. Therefore, Story Points are informal agreements that help teams estimate the amount of effort required for developing a particular feature. Story Points are subjective: the same task can be given three points by one team but five points by another.

However, some teams tend to treat Story Points as measures of success. In this case, team members would be focused on reaching a specific number of points instead of concentrating on delivering value. Your team might end uplooking productive rather than really being productive. Remember that Story Points don’t matter but value does.

Sign #6 Incorrect Velocity Tracking

In some companies, managers compare individual velocity of Agile team members by counting the number of Story Points each of them achieves. Though this method sounds reasonable, it’s at odds with the essence of Agile, which is all about collaboration.

Team members work together and, as it’s been mentioned above, they must be focused on delivering value, not on achieving a certain number of Story Points.

Sign #7 Urgent Tasks That Interrupt Workflow

Probably, every development team sometimes needs to handle urgent tasks (e.g. adding new features to a product) that aren’t in a sprint backlog. Such interruptions distract the team and make a negative impact on productivity, since the team might fail to reach the sprint goal.

Interruptions should be managed by a Product Owner. Once some urgent tasks appear, a PO has to add them to the product backlog and re-prioritize it.

Sign #8 Large Number of Uncompleted Tasks

Sometimes, development teams seem to fulfill all the tasks in their sprint backlogs, while most tasks aren’t fully done. Needless to say, incomplete tasks will have to be done during the next sprint. Though fulfilling all the tasks in a sprint backlog may be challenging, it’s still better to have 90% of them fully done rather than having 100% of tasks 90% done.

Sign #9 Technical Debt

Very often, developers need to make changes to their projects. The reasons may be different: bug fixing, refactoring, or redesigning. Accumulating technical debt is a grave mistake that immensely reduces a team’s productivity.

Instead, technical changes must be carried out as soon as possible since it’s much easier to handle them within a sprint rather than during the final stages of the development process.

Don’t Just Practice Agile, Be Agile

A common mistake of many software development companies is treating Agile merely as a methodology. However, this view isn’t quite correct. A person truly dedicated to software development should have an “Agile mindset” that includes the following:

Desire to learn;

Focus on team success;

No fear of mistakes.

That’s why the implementation of the best Agile practices isn’t enough. Team members should shift their way of thinking to deliver successful state-of-the-art products.

 

Gleb

Gleb B

Blog Author

Gleb B is a technical copywriter at a RubyGarage, a web and mobile development company. He likes writing on topics related to software development and digital technologies. Gleb has been in the industry for over 2 years.
 

Join the Discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Suggested Blogs

Product Backlog Refinement in Scrum

Product Backlog Refinement, also referred to as Product Backlog Grooming, is a method for keeping the backlog updated, clean and orderly. It is a basic process in Scrum. PBR is a collaborative discussion process which starts at the end of one sprint to confirm whether the backlog is ready for the next sprint. Backlog can be defined as a set of user stories which are not present in the current sprint that defines project’s scope context. The stories which are left unattended, may interfere with the functioning of the development team.When this happens, the status of user stories will not be clear, and even the team can lose focus and fail to deliver within the project completion date. The backlog grooming meeting is attended by the scrum master, who facilitates everything for team members, the team and the product owner. They decide among the top items from the product backlog. The team comprises mainly of Developers, testers and Scrum Masters. The team can raise queries during the sprint planning session if they find any unresolved issue. The expected doubts can arise in the following forms : How to handle the situation if the user enters invalid data? Which part of the system are the users authorized to operate on? For the product owner, it will be easy to get the conclusion over the queries, by asking these questions in the early stages. If there is a question which is unanswered by too many people, it is time to make some changes in your backlog items by curating higher priority items to the top of the list and assigning highest priority to the unanswered questions. The Objective of PBR meeting: A lot of time is saved at sprint planning meetings, if the backlogs are well maintained. If the backlog item is clearly specified in the acceptance criteria and cross-checked properly by the team members, the planning process can be accomplished prior to the meeting. PBR offers the team members the opportunity to interact with each other regarding stories. Why is PBR important?  PBR and its sessions are important mainly due to the following features- It increases the efficiency of the team by reducing uncertainty Properly refined stories are easy to estimate, test and implement. PBR session increases the efficiency of the team due to the knowledge shared among the team members. If PBR meeting is maintained properly, it helps reduce the time for a Sprint planning meeting. The Product Backlog grooming can be made effective if the following aspects are considered- Do not schedule backlog refinement meeting during the first and last 20% of the Sprint Planning session. Backlog refinement meeting should be considered as the first part of Sprint Planning. The backlog items’ list should be well understood by the PO, or development team member to work well in the meeting. Make sure that the set of predefined acceptance tests are present. Keep an eye on the meeting goals. Make sure to assign action items for any unknown thing. Do remember that the backlog items are a collaboration between the PO and the team. Feel free to break the product backlog items during the meeting. After the product backlog refinement meeting, the team can update the Product Backlog items in line, based on the discussions held. Finally, you can get a potentially shippable product, ready to be deployed in the market.
Rated 4.0/5 based on 20 customer reviews
1664
Product Backlog Refinement in Scrum

Product Backlog Refinement, also referred to as Pr... Read More

Benefits of Implementing Agile Practices for Infrastructure Operations Support Teams

Agile methodologies have become mainstream and more than 90% of the organizations had indicated that they are practising Agile in some form or the other (Version One, State of Agile Survey, 2016). In this post, I will highlight how a specific Agile methodology is used in the infrastructure space to manage routine operations work.  In the infrastructure domain, there are not many organizations which are using Agile as it is not easy to implement the scaled Agile framework (Scrum) as the nature of work is more from the operational perspective as compared to the product development space where the focus is on knowledge work. However, in large enterprise organizations (> 5000 members), if an organization has to become agile, all the divisions will sooner or later need to focus on Agile. The organization does not derive much benefit if only one division in the organization is focused on Agile and all the other divisions are not being agile. Hence, initially as part of the Agile transformation, the product development division adopts Agile and subsequently, other support divisions also focus on exploring Agile and how to implement Agile for their activities.  With this background context, I would like to explain how the Infrastructure teams which are engaged in operational activities focus on implementing Agile in their projects/activities. Taking the specific example of a Unix Server Support team which is offering support for L1, L2 and L3 activities (L1, L2 and L3 – different and increasingly varying and higher levels of support where the team focuses on providing support to the customer, e.g. – L1 – call center support, L2 – Basic configuration and minor changes, L3 – Deep Dive and resolution of problems). Generally, the Infrastructure teams follow the ITIL Best Practices to ensure that their services are providing optimal support to the customer (24*7 support – also enabling follow the sun approach). In this case, when we are implementing Agile practices for these teams, I have observed that Kanban practices and a good Kanban framework help the team integrate ITIL with Agile practices.  These teams are focused on operations work which is routine and is undertaken daily through the implementation of a help desk support system (Service Now, Impulse, Jump, Remedy and other tools) utilizing tickets that are raised by people and non – humans (computer programs).  The tickets are raised automatically by computer programs (incidents), raised by humans (mostly requests), problems (raised by humans), change requests/ctasks (change tasks) by humans. Hence, ITIL implementation provides a good focus on the key areas – Incident Management, Problem Management, Change Management, Help Desk and related areas. In such a scenario, the implementation of Kanban helps to integrate ITIL and Agile and the team does not feel the extra burden of the Agile implementation. Kanban easily dovetails with the existing ITIL framework and the team is able to implement both Kanban and ITIL at the same time. This ensures that the team is meeting the organizational requirements and at the same time, the team is also able to implement Agile as per the requirements.  The routine operational work of these teams is considered as one big project focused on delivering operational support and meeting the service level agreements for the customer. Kanban is basically a framework for managing the process flow and change in a visual manner. It starts with the as-is state and slowly builds on incremental improvements to improve the process over a period of time. Hence, it becomes easier to start with the already existing ITIL processes which the teams are already following in their day to day work. The Kanban system focuses on visualizing the process flow and identifying the bottlenecks in the process and how they could be eliminated so that the process becomes faster from concept to cash. In this case, it derives the basic inspiration from Lean principles which are also focused on identifying and maximizing value, while minimizing waste at the same time.  The focus on implementing Kanban frameworks for the Operations team in the Infrastructure domain leads to the following benefits–  The team can manage its process flow with the already existing systems in place (e.g. lean, ITIL and other process models/frameworks).  Workload Management, Capacity Adaptation, and Capability/Competency Improvement in the teams. It is easier for the team to implement Agile practices as Kanban focuses on starting with the existing processes instead of making any drastic changes in the basic process.  The team is able to visualize the basic work through the technique of value stream mapping (VSM) and it is able to eliminate bottlenecks using the Theory of Constraints (ToC).  The team is able to identify the core values and focus on how to enhance customer delight.  Implementing Agile practices leads to improved team motivation and team morale.  Focus on working at a sustainable pace instead of working in death march projects which leads to quicker burnout and increased attrition.  It helps the team to visualize the workflows which enables the team to focus on out-of-the-box thinking and innovative techniques to improve lead times of their processes.  Simple metrics like – lead time, cumulative flow diagrams and Yamazumi charts help the team to focus on their processes and check how they could fine tune their processes further.  Lessons learnt as part of the Kanban meetings and workshops enable the team to focus on continuous improvement.  The focus on Kanban practices enables the team to set up a robust ecosystem in the organization that engenders continuous learning and enables the organization to build the skill level of its employees.  Assimilation of new processes by the team through design thinking and other techniques for providing operational support helps the team to improve customer satisfaction. Thus, we can observe that the choice of selecting Kanban as an Agile implementation methodology for the Operations Support Teams in the Infrastructure domain is a prudent option as it helps the team to continue following its existing processes and at the same time also implement Agile practices in their projects with minimal conflicts. In future posts, I will highlight how we could go about implementing Kanban and Agile practices in the Infrastructure Operations Support teams, providing support to the product development teams in the organization.   
Rated 4.0/5 based on 20 customer reviews
1460
Benefits of Implementing Agile Practices for Infra...

Agile methodologies have become mainstream and mor... Read More

CSM or CSPO: Which Certification Fits Your Requirement?

Agile methodology has been gaining a lot of clout in the IT Industry recently. With so much attention and talks around it all companies big and small are making themselves agile ready to deliver better sooner. Some common Certificate courses on Scrum methodology have also gained popularity because Scrum is the least restrictive of all agile approaches. CSM and CSPO are two such known Certifications that are often thought of as next steps in career progression introspection analysis. While both grant the benefit of knowledge, it is important to analyse what Certification makes more sense and can help better in future growth.     CSM Certification: It is for professionals seeking the Certified Scrum Master Certification. Its course work is educative to learn about how Scrum methodology works. Moreover, all the principles and practices around scrum are discussed in detail to lay a sound foundation of its conceptual framework. This certification is beneficial to gain an understanding of Scrum for all present and future scrum projects. Gaining a CSM Certification would benefit individuals who would rather want a Certification that validates their scrum knowledge. Hiring decisions based on Certifications are usually a motivator for professionals pursuing the Certification. This could also lead to challenging opportunities in a space that may interest professionals. Also, professionals seeking to change their present roles can also benefit from this certification to project their interest in this field. Other benefits of CSM could be acceptance in scrum based teams based on scrum knowledge. Also since a lot of organisations tend to portray to their respective client base they own the skills and knowledge to deliver, they also rely on certified professionals to join them so that they may use this as their asset over competitors. Another reason to pursue CSM could also be to expand ones’ knowledge of scrum methodology to be at par with peers. Since existing technical courses do not teach these new methodologies in courseware, pursuing a course about Scrum can help deliver work better if you have recently joined a scrum team or if you plan to join one. So, it is beneficial not only for professionals seeking knowledge as fresher but also for experienced professionals who seek work in scrum space.   CSPO Training: CSPO is a common IT Certification acronym for Certified Scrum Product Owner. CSPO Certification is beneficial for professionals who are closer to business.  This course is also useful to give an end to end view of the feature that traverses from conceptualisation to deployment or ideation to a minimum viable product. Also, aspects related to understanding stakeholder interests in each functionality are reiterated in this course. Also, because a Product Owner’s role is critical for any organisation they tend to seek candidates who can genuinely guide the team well. While Certification is a way to project, that relevant knowledge is present and make way for a baseline to set that a candidate has genuine interest in the area and that they are focused on continuous growth. A Certified Scrum Product Owner training is also a good to have training to be able to handle the work as a Product Owner better. While a lot of professionals learn on the job, this certification is from the very Scrum Alliance dedicated to set guidelines that can help smoothen the learning curve. A Certification decision is hence usually based on career goals, present career role, and future possible roadmap. Having knowledge is always good and to keep refreshing basics helps revisiting decisions and making teams and individuals in scrum space more effective.
Rated 4.0/5 based on 20 customer reviews
1367
CSM or CSPO: Which Certification Fits Your Require...

Agile methodology has been gaining a lot of clout ... Read More

other Blogs